Nassim Nicolas Taleb provides 10 rules that if followed will reduce or even completely eliminate the risk of Black Swans in the economy. Check out the full detail of these rules in his article. Here’s the list of rules he proposes:
- What is fragile should break early while it is still small.
- No socialisation of losses and privatisation of gains.
- People who were driving a school bus blindfolded (and crashed it) should never be given a new bus.
- Do not let someone making an “incentive” bonus manage a nuclear plant – or your financial risks.
- Counter-balance complexity with simplicity.
- Do not give children sticks of dynamite, even if they come with a warning.
- Only Ponzi schemes should depend on confidence. Governments should never need to “restore confidence”.
- Do not give an addict more drugs if he has withdrawal pains.
- Citizens should not depend on financial assets or fallible “expert” advice for their retirement.
- Make an omelette with the broken eggs.
His is an interesting list because it makes you think: could these rules be further simplified? I believe they can. Taleb makes the assumption so many other make: we need institutions. There’s no justification for this desire other than habit: we’re so used to having institutions that we can’t even imagine a world where institutional forms of organization are much less dominant.
By letting go of the need to have institutions I can rewrite Taleb’s 10 rules as 5 rules:
What is fragile should break early while it is still small.Don’t use institutions.No socialisation of losses and privatisation of gains.People who were driving a school bus blindfolded (and crashed it) should never be given a new bus.Do not let someone making an “incentive” bonus manage a nuclear plant – or your financial risks.- Counter-balance complexity with simplicity.
- Do not give children sticks of dynamite, even if they come with a warning.
- Only Ponzi schemes should depend on confidence. Governments should never need to “restore confidence”.
Do not give an addict more drugs if he has withdrawal pains.Citizens should not depend on financial assets or fallible “expert” advice for their retirement.- Make an omelette with the broken eggs.
Taleb’s rules 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 9 are a direct result of the institutional model. Institutions are great devises to let a few conspire against many. In other words: institutions depend on opacity from the outside to function. In collaborative models every participant is part of the working system and while abuse by a few is still possible it becomes much easier to detect and adapt the system based on lessons learned.
Institutions in the form of collaboration are given their charter by the state. This is no accident since the state itself is an institution. The state enforces the institutional model in its laws upon those that want to run their own business. This is a fatal flaw in our society and one that cannot disappear unless our current model of society disappears.
For this reason Taleb’s 10 rules or my 5 rules will never be adopted in our current model of society. The state is uniquely concerned with self-preservation. Our culture is uniquely concerned with control. Without a collapse nothing will change and everything that’s bad today will become worse tomorrow. The good news is that the current state of erosion appears to be so advanced that collapse is imminent.
{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }
Good points, Steven. Elegance is simple.
One way of getting the omelette together, sans institution, works when control is NOT attempted. It is called Open Space Technology.
Bernd,
Thanks for pointing to Open Space, fascinating reading.
Steven
Steven this is great post, thank you. I don’t think scale is the issue, however, attitude is the issue. We need to get our heads around the value of social connectivity as an evolutionary force upon institutions and work with that.
Just as Edward Maynaerd’s stop frame photography of horses in motion in 1876 revealed things we didn’t previously know about motion and emotion, so social networks when expertly developed give us the opportunity to understand and tune into the energetic pulse of large groups at any given point in time. Scale is not the issue in this context but what we do with it, in fact the group mind at work and critical mass is what makes the power of networks so appealing in many ways.
Karen Stephenson’s done a lot of work in this area and I agree with her when she says a network or community will always be stronger that any point in time than a hierarchy, but a hierarchy will endure for far longer than a network. I believe we need to overlay the two. Doing this will enable hetararchies, meshed trusted networks with a retained hierarchical framework. This will eliminate the need for institutions but can retain all the security that we once sought to achieve through the institutionalized model.
Hey Anne, good to hear from you. Very good point, this got me thinking.
What you describe as attitude is indeed the shock of realizing that our old models - in which we have hedged our future wellbeing - are being seriously challenged by chaotic social connections that didn’t exist before. I think this is the essence: the fear that all the hedging we’ve done throughout our lives against the future will turn out to be useless to a large degree.
However, I see no way to avoid this reality. Our current models of organizing and governing are dying and have to be replaced. There will be a lot of pain. This is what Marc Andreessen calls the different between chronic pain and acute pain. The pain we experience today is the chronic pain. In order to get rid of this pain we have to deal with the acute pain which is much stronger yet much shorter.
Thanks for bringing this up Anne, great discussion.
Steven
I was wondering if you saw his article.
BTW, what do you mean by no institutions?
Hey Ed,
I mean ‘no institutions’ in the sense of Clay Shirky’s Institutions vs collaboration. Freerisk is an emerging example of how this could work.
Steven
Only an insensitive young man or a fool would look forward to collapse. It’s not fun now, and it will be worse later.
That said, have you heard of
?